![]() |
|||||||||||||
| Co-ordinated by : Kerala Agricultural University & Indian Institute of Information Technology & Management - Kerala | |||||||||||||
ORGANIC FARMINGOrganic Certification and AccreditationIncreased consumption of organic foods has resulted in a budding international organic market. However, lack of established trade guidelines and global organic standards has, to a certain extent, thwarted rapid growth in trade. It is expected that, as these guidelines formalize and global demand for organic product increases, international trade will grow. Organic certification and accreditation are increasingly important aspects in international production and trade of organic products. There is, at present, no regulation on organic standards applicable worldwide. However, the World Trade Organization and the global trading community are increasingly relying on the Codex Alimentarius (Codex) and the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) to provide the basis for international organic production principles, as well as verification of production systems (i.e., certification and accreditation). The most important guide for organic certification is ISO Guide 65:1996, General Requirements for Bodies Operating Product Certification Systems, which establishes basic operating principles for certification bodies. There is no guide which specifically addresses certification of production methods. Certification ensures that organic products are produced, processed, and packaged according to organic production regulations or guidelines which usually include an assessment of the product process as to minimize environmental impacts (specifically, soil and water quality). Certification also ensures consumers, producers, and traders against fraudulent or misleading labeling of non-organic products by providing transparency as information on certified producing organizations and their products is normally made public. The accreditation process, conducted by an independent accreditation body, evaluates a certifier’s inspection and certification procedures, as well as that organization’s ability to remain free from vested interests. There is no international regulation on who may or may not carry out accreditation. However, several countries have designed official accreditation and certification bodies in addition to the many independent organizations worldwide. US Certification StandardsThe proposed organic standards require that any livestock or edible livestock product to be sold, labeled, or represented as organic must be maintained under continuous organic management from birth or hatching until brought to market. However, there are four exceptions:
The producer of an organic livestock operation must also maintain records sufficient to preserve the identity of all organically managed livestock and all edible and non-edible organic livestock products produced. European Certification StandardsFor organic livestock production, the main areas covered by standards in addition to those covering inspection, certification, labelling and general requirements for organic products, are (1) Conversion, (2) Breeding, (3) Welfare and environment issues, (4) Nutrition, (5) Health management, (6) Transport and slaughter and (7) Social justice. The detailed husbandry standards of organic farming are primarily based on the principles of enhancement and exploitation of the natural biological cycles in soil (e.g N fixation, nutrient cycling in the soil), in crops (e.g. manipulation of competitive ability of crops and populations of natural predators of crop pests) and in livestock (e.g. rumen digestion in ruminants, development of natural immunity in young animals, interruption of host/pathogen relationships). In addition, there is strong emphasis on optimising animal welfare, avoidance of pollution and improvement of the environmental infrastructure of the farm.
Indian Certification StandardsAgricultural and Processed Food Products Development Authority (APEDA) through National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) has national standards for organic production of agriculture and animal husbandry. The recommendation made in its report of 2005 suggest that any decision the farmer makes - for example, on grassland management, on housing, on reproductive pattern - he should place the highest priority on the likely impact on livestock health. Whilst livestock systems vary enormously and it is difficult to generalise, some of the elements, which have been suggested for inclusion in preventive health strategies, are listed below:
Last updated: 04-1-2008 |
|
||||||||||||
| About Project | Project Partners | Guest Book | Disclaimer | Contact us | Site Map | Portal login Designed & maintained by IIITM-K, © VUAT 2007, 2008 |
|||||||||||||